Tweet
Writing Papers with Focus: Avoiding Tangential Information
I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve started writing an essay, only to realize a few paragraphs in that I’ve wandered into some side discussion that barely connects to my original point. It always starts out feeling relevant—maybe a historical example, an extra piece of context, or just an interesting thought that popped into my head while writing. And then suddenly, I’m halfway through the paper, and my thesis is buried under all this extra information that might be interesting but doesn’t actually belong.
Keeping a paper focused isn’t just about sticking to a topic. It’s about knowing what matters to the argument and what’s just extra noise.
The Problem With Tangents
Tangents don’t always feel like tangents when you’re writing them. That’s what makes them tricky.
Maybe you’re writing about government surveillance, and suddenly, you’re deep in a historical discussion about the Cold War. Or you’re discussing climate policy, and before you know it, you’re explaining the entire history of the Paris Agreement. These things feel relevant, but they’re not moving the argument forward.
The biggest issue? Tangents eat up space without adding value. Every paragraph in a research paper should be doing something—supporting the thesis, providing evidence, or clarifying an argument. If a section isn’t doing any of that, it probably doesn’t need to be there.
How to Recognize When You’re Going Off-Track
The best way I’ve found to catch tangents is to check if a paragraph directly connects back to the thesis. If I have to stretch to explain why a section is relevant, it’s probably not.
A few questions I ask myself:
I’ve had to cut sections that I spent way too much time writing, which is painful, but the end result is always a stronger, more focused paper.
The Role of Outlines in Staying Focused
I used to skip outlines because I thought they were boring and unnecessary. But when I finally started using them, I realized they don’t just make writing easier—they make it tighter.
Now, I outline in a way that’s flexible. I don’t plan out every sentence, but I do make a roadmap:
If something doesn’t fit into this structure, it’s probably a tangent.
Cutting Unnecessary Context
Some tangents come from trying to explain everything before getting to the point. I’ve done this more times than I’d like to admit.
For example, say I’m writing about how social media algorithms shape political opinions. I might start with a huge introduction about the history of social media, how Facebook was founded, how Twitter changed over the years… and by the time I actually get to my argument, I’ve wasted two pages on information that isn’t necessary.
A good rule? Start with what’s needed, not what’s interesting. Background info should be brief—just enough to set up the argument. Anything beyond that belongs in footnotes, not the main paper.
The Unexpected Lesson from SEO Writing
I didn’t expect to learn about academic writing from working with SEO, but there’s actually a weirdly strong connection. When optimizing content, a big part of the job is measuring content performance online—figuring out what information keeps readers engaged and what makes them bounce.
That’s when I realized that research papers aren’t that different. A paper that’s overloaded with irrelevant information is like a blog post that ranks for the wrong keywords—unfocused, hard to follow, and ultimately ineffective. Keeping writing focused isn’t just about clarity. It’s about keeping the reader engaged.
Using Tools to Stay on Track
One thing that’s helped me stay focused? Using study software for time management.
I used to just write in one long sitting, assuming I’d revise later. But when I started breaking my writing into focused blocks—20 or 30 minutes at a time—I became more aware of when I was veering off-topic. Tools like Pomodoro timers or apps that track how long I spend on each section have actually made my writing sharper because I’m not just writing—I’m evaluating what I’m writing in real time.
Final Thoughts: Writing with Purpose
At the end of the day, writing a focused paper isn’t just about avoiding tangents—it’s about making every sentence count. If something doesn’t push the argument forward, it’s just extra weight dragging the paper down.
So now, whenever I write, I remind myself:
And most importantly, be willing to let go of the parts that don’t serve the bigger picture. That’s what makes a paper work.
I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve started writing an essay, only to realize a few paragraphs in that I’ve wandered into some side discussion that barely connects to my original point. It always starts out feeling relevant—maybe a historical example, an extra piece of context, or just an interesting thought that popped into my head while writing. And then suddenly, I’m halfway through the paper, and my thesis is buried under all this extra information that might be interesting but doesn’t actually belong.
Keeping a paper focused isn’t just about sticking to a topic. It’s about knowing what matters to the argument and what’s just extra noise.
The Problem With Tangents
Tangents don’t always feel like tangents when you’re writing them. That’s what makes them tricky.
Maybe you’re writing about government surveillance, and suddenly, you’re deep in a historical discussion about the Cold War. Or you’re discussing climate policy, and before you know it, you’re explaining the entire history of the Paris Agreement. These things feel relevant, but they’re not moving the argument forward.
The biggest issue? Tangents eat up space without adding value. Every paragraph in a research paper should be doing something—supporting the thesis, providing evidence, or clarifying an argument. If a section isn’t doing any of that, it probably doesn’t need to be there.
How to Recognize When You’re Going Off-Track
The best way I’ve found to catch tangents is to check if a paragraph directly connects back to the thesis. If I have to stretch to explain why a section is relevant, it’s probably not.
A few questions I ask myself:
- Does this section support the main argument, or is it just background info?
- If I deleted this paragraph, would my paper still make sense?
- Am I including this just because I find it interesting?
I’ve had to cut sections that I spent way too much time writing, which is painful, but the end result is always a stronger, more focused paper.
The Role of Outlines in Staying Focused
I used to skip outlines because I thought they were boring and unnecessary. But when I finally started using them, I realized they don’t just make writing easier—they make it tighter.
Now, I outline in a way that’s flexible. I don’t plan out every sentence, but I do make a roadmap:
- Intro & Thesis – What’s the argument? Why does it matter?
- Main Points – What are the three (or four) strongest points that support the thesis?
- Evidence & Analysis – What sources will I use for each point?
- Conclusion – How does everything tie together?
If something doesn’t fit into this structure, it’s probably a tangent.
Cutting Unnecessary Context
Some tangents come from trying to explain everything before getting to the point. I’ve done this more times than I’d like to admit.
For example, say I’m writing about how social media algorithms shape political opinions. I might start with a huge introduction about the history of social media, how Facebook was founded, how Twitter changed over the years… and by the time I actually get to my argument, I’ve wasted two pages on information that isn’t necessary.
A good rule? Start with what’s needed, not what’s interesting. Background info should be brief—just enough to set up the argument. Anything beyond that belongs in footnotes, not the main paper.
The Unexpected Lesson from SEO Writing
I didn’t expect to learn about academic writing from working with SEO, but there’s actually a weirdly strong connection. When optimizing content, a big part of the job is measuring content performance online—figuring out what information keeps readers engaged and what makes them bounce.
That’s when I realized that research papers aren’t that different. A paper that’s overloaded with irrelevant information is like a blog post that ranks for the wrong keywords—unfocused, hard to follow, and ultimately ineffective. Keeping writing focused isn’t just about clarity. It’s about keeping the reader engaged.
Using Tools to Stay on Track
One thing that’s helped me stay focused? Using study software for time management.
I used to just write in one long sitting, assuming I’d revise later. But when I started breaking my writing into focused blocks—20 or 30 minutes at a time—I became more aware of when I was veering off-topic. Tools like Pomodoro timers or apps that track how long I spend on each section have actually made my writing sharper because I’m not just writing—I’m evaluating what I’m writing in real time.
Final Thoughts: Writing with Purpose
At the end of the day, writing a focused paper isn’t just about avoiding tangents—it’s about making every sentence count. If something doesn’t push the argument forward, it’s just extra weight dragging the paper down.
So now, whenever I write, I remind myself:
- Stick to the thesis.
- Cut anything that isn’t necessary.
- Keep the reader engaged.
And most importantly, be willing to let go of the parts that don’t serve the bigger picture. That’s what makes a paper work.