According to an Associated Press story today , the Governor of Kentucky is using the state's court system to grant him control over domain names of various gambling sites.
He has already taken over control of two sites and is seeking control of a total of 140.
The Governor claims that these sites are hurting the gambling industry in Kentucky.
I don't understand, however, how he can be granted control, over sites that operate legally in another country and offer their services legally to residents of other countries.
If he can do this, then what is to prevent anyone in any country in the world from getting a court order to take over a web site that they don't like.
If a Mullah in Iran doesn't like alcohol, can he get an order from that country's court to take over the domain name - budweiser.com?
Does thiis make any sense?
Read the story here - http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/...ap5458185.html
He has already taken over control of two sites and is seeking control of a total of 140.
The Governor claims that these sites are hurting the gambling industry in Kentucky.
I don't understand, however, how he can be granted control, over sites that operate legally in another country and offer their services legally to residents of other countries.
If he can do this, then what is to prevent anyone in any country in the world from getting a court order to take over a web site that they don't like.
If a Mullah in Iran doesn't like alcohol, can he get an order from that country's court to take over the domain name - budweiser.com?
Does thiis make any sense?
Read the story here - http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/...ap5458185.html
Comment